Estimate what an Instagram sponsored post is worth
Type a public username, or paste a profile URL, above to see an estimated per-post range.
How the estimated earnings reading is taken
- 01Type a public username, or paste a profile URL, into the field.
- 02Verniera reads the follower count and the engagement rate on recent posts.
- 03Both feed a per-post range that scales with size, then widens for cheaper local markets versus expensive ones, and for ordinary creators versus household names.
Check something else
Common questions
This is a range, and it is an estimate
No tool can tell you what a creator was paid. Rates are negotiated privately and two profiles with the same follower count routinely price five to twenty times apart. What this instrument does is take two public numbers — follower count and engagement rate — and place them against published 2026 Instagram rate data to produce a band that most ordinary deals of that shape land inside.
That is what every Instagram money calculator is doing underneath. This one is free, needs no login, and shows its working rather than printing one confident number.
The width of the band is the point, not a hedge. It is how the model admits the things it cannot see: where the audience lives, how famous the person is, and what the brand is actually buying.
Treat the card as a starting position for a conversation. It is not a quote, not an offer, and not a promise of income.
How the number is built
The mid of the range is a rate per thousand followers that falls as the account grows. A 8,000-follower page is commonly paid around $14 to $20 per thousand followers for a static feed post. A 2-million-follower page is commonly paid around $4 to $6 per thousand. Brands pay for attention, and attention per follower declines with size.
That mid is then moved by engagement. A profile whose audience responds above the healthy band for its size prices higher, because the brand is buying comments and saves rather than a headcount. A quiet audience of the same size discounts the mid, often by half.
The low and high are not a plus-or-minus around that mid. They encode two markets that public data cannot tell apart:
- The floor is a local page whose audience sits in a cheaper advertising market — India, Indonesia, the Philippines, Pakistan, Egypt, much of Latin America — where brands pay 10 to 35 percent of a US rate for the same follower count.
- The ceiling is a US, UK, German or Gulf audience in a valuable niche (finance, software, travel, luxury). Past a million followers the ceiling opens further, because a household name is a different product from a creator who happens to have a million followers.
How much do Instagram influencers make per post?
| Followers | Typical static feed post (USD) | What the spread is doing |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000 to 10,000 | $25 to $250 | Nano rates. Local pages sit near the floor; US micro-niches near the top. |
| 10,000 to 50,000 | $100 to $800 | The band most small brands actually buy in. |
| 50,000 to 100,000 | $250 to $2,500 | Engagement starts to matter more than the extra followers. |
| 100,000 to 500,000 | $500 to $8,000 | Niche and country now move the number more than size does. |
| 500,000 to 1 million | $2,000 to $20,000 | Macro creators. Still priced like creators, not like celebrities. |
| 1 to 10 million | $3,000 to $150,000 | Fame takes over. See the section below. |
| Over 10 million | $8,000 upward, often six figures | A different market. Many of these accounts do not sell feed posts at all. |
The old rule of thumb — $10 per thousand followers — lands near the bottom of the smaller bands and is far too high for a local million-follower page in a cheap market. It is a floor for US nano accounts, not a rate.
Reels typically carry two to three times the rate of a static post, because they reach past the existing audience. Stories usually price well below a feed post and are often bundled rather than sold alone.
Million-follower pages are not one product
Above about a million followers, follower count stops being the price. Two accounts at 5 million are not comparable:
- A creator who is known in a niche — a fitness coach, a food page, a regional entertainer — still prices like a creator. Deals often land in the low thousands to low tens of thousands of dollars per static post, and lower than that if the audience is local to a cheaper market.
- A public figure who is known everywhere — an actor, a footballer, a musician whose name is the product — prices on fame, access and association. Those deals routinely sit at the top of this instrument's range, and the largest names sit several times above it. Cristiano Ronaldo and a 600-million lifestyle creator are not in the same market.
- An institutional or brand page — NASA, National Geographic, a football club, a fashion house — often does not sell classic sponsored feed posts. Partnerships, if they happen, are packaged as licensing, ambassadorships or media buys, and the card's range is a sanity check rather than a rate card.
That is why the range widens sharply past a million, and why the notes under the card say so. A single number would be a lie. If you are pricing a million-plus page, ask who the person is to the audience, not how many people follow them.
Country and purchasing power
Brands pay for the chance that someone will buy. An impression in the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Switzerland or the Gulf is worth more to most advertisers than the same impression in a market where household income and advertising rates are lower. This is uncomfortable and it is how the market prices.
The index below is relative to a US audience at 100. It applies to where the audience lives, not where the creator sleeps. A creator in Cairo whose followers are mostly in the US is a US page for pricing purposes. A creator in Los Angeles whose followers are mostly in Indonesia is not. What this feels like from the receiving end is set out in why Instagram rates differ so much by country.
| Audience market | Instagram rate vs US | What that means on a 100,000-follower page |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 100 | The benchmark. Highest brand demand and purchasing power. |
| United Kingdom | 80–90 | Close to US rates. Slightly less brand competition. |
| Australia, Canada | 65–80 | English-speaking, high income, 20–35% below US. |
| Germany, Nordics, Switzerland | 65–90 | Strong purchasing power. Switzerland often matches or exceeds the US. |
| France, Netherlands, Japan, South Korea | 55–75 | High-income, slightly cheaper creator markets. |
| UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait | 55–90 | Luxury and Gulf audiences can match US rates. Local non-luxury sits lower. |
| Italy, Spain, Israel, Singapore | 50–70 | Mid-to-high. Singapore punches above its size for finance and luxury. |
| Poland, Turkey, South Africa | 25–45 | Growing markets. Turkish local pages price well below Gulf ones. |
| Brazil, Mexico, Argentina | 25–45 | Large, engaged audiences. Rates 55–75% below US. |
| India | 15–30 | Huge creator supply, lower advertiser CPMs. Diaspora and English professional audiences sit at the top of this band. |
| Indonesia, Philippines, Vietnam, Thailand | 10–25 | High engagement, low advertising rates. |
| Egypt, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nigeria | 10–20 | Local brand deals in local currency convert to a small USD number. |
A 40,000-follower food page in Jakarta, Lagos or Mumbai and a 40,000-follower food page in Los Angeles or Dubai are not the same inventory. The card's floor is closer to the first; the card's ceiling is closer to the second.
Gulf luxury is the exception people miss. An Arabic-language page whose audience is in the UAE or Saudi Arabia can price nearer the US than the rest of the region, because the advertiser is buying high-income attention.
What else moves a rate away from the middle
Niche. Finance, software, B2B and travel pay several times what lifestyle and entertainment pay at the same follower count, because the audience is worth more per person to the advertiser. A 20,000-follower account reviewing accounting software can out-earn a 200,000-follower lifestyle account.
Exclusivity and usage. "One post, stays up 30 days" is one price. "Post, plus the brand runs it as an advert for six months" is a different one, often two to four times higher. Usage rights are where inexperienced creators leave the most money.
Who approached whom. An inbound brand with a budget and a deadline pays more than a creator pitching cold.
Consistency. A profile posting three times a week for two years prices above one with the same numbers and a six-month gap.
Using the range as a creator
Take the top of the range as your opening number if your audience is in an expensive market or a valuable niche. Take nearer the middle if you are local to a cheaper market — and say so, rather than discovering it when a foreign brand's offer looks insulting and was in fact indexed correctly.
Quote the Instagram engagement rate alongside the follower count in every pitch. If the audience responds above the band for its size, that is the argument for a higher rate, and it is the argument brands find hardest to refuse.
Price usage separately. The post is one line; the right to run it as paid media is another, and it should never be given away inside the first number.
Using the range as a brand
The range is a sanity check on a rate card, not a target. A creator quoting several times the top of it may have data you have not seen — strong reach, proven conversion, an audience in an expensive market, or a name people already know. Ask for it before deciding the number is unreasonable.
A creator quoting far below the range is worth a second look too. Very low rates often come with a purchased audience, which is why the fake follower check belongs in the same session. They also come with local pages in cheaper markets, which is not a quality problem — it is a purchasing-power one. Those pages are correctly cheap for a US campaign and correctly priced for a local one.
What this instrument cannot see
It cannot see reach, saves or shares, which are private to the account. It cannot see what any previous brand actually paid. It cannot see the audience's location or age, which is why country is a spread rather than a line. It cannot tell whether the person is famous outside Instagram. It cannot tell whether a post will sell anything, which is the only number that decides whether the rate was worth it.
Every figure here is public arithmetic against public benchmarks. Where the result is a guess, it is shown as a range, and it is labelled as an estimate on the card itself.
Limits, stated plainly
- An estimate, always shown as a range. Never a quote and never a promise.
- US dollars, because published rate data is quoted in dollars. Local currency deals convert at the market's own rate, not at a tourist exchange rate.
- Static feed posts. Reels and stories price differently.
- Public posts only. A private account has no public engagement to price.
- Twenty lookups an hour from one connection.
- Not affiliated with Instagram or Meta Platforms, Inc.